Drawing for DWAVE

USPTO serial 87332773

DWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Kitchen containers; Kitchen grinders, non-electric; Kitchen ladles; Kitchen mitts; Kitchen urns; Kitchen utensil crocks; Kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; Kitchen utensils, namely, pouring and straining spouts; Kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; Abrasive pads for kitchen or domestic purposes; Abrasive pads for kitchen purposes; Basting spoons; Bread-cases; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Containers for household or kitchen use; Containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; Containers for household or kitchen use of precious metal; Crushers for kitchen use, non-electric; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dishers; Dryer balls sold empty used to disperse disinfectants to articles in a dryer; Dryer balls that are placed in the clothes drying machine with the clothing to assist in the drying process; Egg rings; Graters for kitchen use; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Ice tongs; Japanese style earthenware mortars for kitchen use (suribachi); Japanese style wooden pestles for kitchen use (surikogi); Ladles for serving wine; Ladles, for kitchen use; Molcajete and tejolete for kitchen use; Mortars for kitchen use; Non-electric kitchen containers not made of precious metal; Non-electric crushers for kitchen use; Non-electric ice crushers; Non-electric mincers; Non-electric, pour-over coffee filters not of paper for brewing coffee; Nut crackers; Nut crackers not of precious metal; Nutcrackers; Nutcrackers not of precious metal; Pestles for kitchen use; Plastic bag holders for household use; Portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods; Rotating holders for kitchen utensils; Serving scoops; Spatulas for kitchen use; Sugar tongs; Valet trays; Wood chopping boards for kitchen useACTIVEMay 3, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 5, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 15, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 15, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance