Drawing for STYLOCITY

USPTO serial 87332952

STYLOCITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLOCITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Uri Litvak

URI LITVAK LITVAK LAW GROUP, PC2424 S.E. BRISTOL ST., SUITE 300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for facilitating the custom printing of text and images on articles of clothing that may be downloaded from a global computer network; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for facilitating the custom printing of text and images on articles of clothingACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring clothing and accessoriesACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to create custom printing of text and images on articles of clothing; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for facilitating the custom printing of text and images on articles of clothingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance