USPTO serial 87333068
FEEDBACKNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FEEDBACKNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLARENS, MONTREUX, CH
CLARENS, MONTREUX, CH
ZUG, CH
CAMBRIDGE, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Robins
LAWRENCE R. ROBINS FisherBroyles LLP4 MacQuarrie LaneWestford, MA 01886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voting machines; Computer software to review results and trends and run analysis in the field of client satisfaction performance; Time recording apparatus, namely, apparatus to track and record customers' waiting time; Surveying apparatus and instruments for measuring client satisfaction, measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, proprietary electronic circuit board consisting of 3 buttons; Touch screen tablet computer equipped with a counting application for measuring point of sales client opinion; Computer software for sending text alert messages for mobile phones for alerting a service incident in the field of customer satisfaction analysis, and computer software for sending automatic emails for alerting a service incident in the field of customer satisfaction analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business appraisals; Business information; Business management, namely, monitoring services for business purposes, and gathering and reporting information for business purposes intended to track stores' daily performance and benchmark results and take corrective actions with point of sales manager to improve client loyalty and therefore financial performance; Business data analysis; Business feasibility studies; Business supervision; Business data analysis services; Business enquiry services; Collecting business statistics; Business statistical analysis; Business data analysis; Preparing business reports; Business statistical studies; Analysis of business statistics; Statistical evaluations of marketing data; Market information services relating to market statistics; Analysis of market research data and statistics; Conducting market surveys; Market analysis studies; Work analysis to determine worker skill sets and other worker requirements; Public opinion surveys; Statistical analysis and reporting for business purposes; Conducting market surveys; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business analysis; consumer response analysis, namely, commercial information and advice for consumers; Providing business advice relating to the analysis of consumer buying habits; Consumer research; Design of the advertising content of brochures for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Database development services namely, developing a database compiling customer satisfaction analytics; Product development of customer surveying machines; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software in the field of customer satisfaction analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S. NOW SA
- Other trademarks owned by S. NOW SA
- Other trademarks owned by FORRESTER SWITZERLAND GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FEEDBACKNOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |