USPTO serial 87333593
GD AGILITYNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GD AGILITYNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Justus
MICHAEL R. JUSTUS KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K ST NW, NORTH TOWER, SUITE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for controlling, managing, and sharing patient medical information and clinical data; computer software for remotely facilitating, managing, and delivering medical care and healthcare; computer software for facilitating clinical collaboration among physicians and healthcare providers; computer software to facilitate secure communications and data transfers for medical and healthcare purposes; computer software for exchanging medical data between computers and medical devices and medical sensors; computer software for facilitating and coordinating special medical operations and evacuations in military operations; all of the foregoing services for use by military personnel and first responders in military operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic exchange of patient medical and clinical data via computer, satellite, or telecommunications networks; all of the foregoing services for use by military personnel and first responders in military operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for controlling, managing, and sharing patient medical information and clinical data; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for remotely facilitating, managing, and delivering medical care and healthcare; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for facilitating clinical collaboration among physicians and healthcare providers; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software to facilitate secure communications and data transfers for medical and healthcare purposes; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for exchanging medical data between computers and medical devices and medical sensors; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for facilitating and coordinating special medical operations and evacuations in military operations; all of the foregoing services for use by military personnel and first responders in military operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GD AGILITYNET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |