Drawing for IMPACT THROUGH INTEGRATION

USPTO serial 87334095

IMPACT THROUGH INTEGRATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IMPACT THROUGH INTEGRATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert T. Conway

ROBERT T. CONWAY HOUSTONHOGLE LLP1666 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., SUITE 12LEXINGTON, MA 02420UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for enabling transformation, communication, or interchange of dataACTIVE
038technical consulting in the field of data communicationACTIVE
041training services for the implementation of data protocols and data communicationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Mar 8, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 8, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance