USPTO serial 87334755
LISSMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2020
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LISSMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Showalter
Donald S. Showalter GRAYROBINSON P.A.P.O. BOX 2328FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33303-9998United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Grinding preparations, namely, abrasive paste ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, grinding tools for grinding machines; Brushes being parts of machines; Abrasive blocks being parts of machines; Abrasive brushes being parts of machines; Brushes, abrasive blocks and abrasive brushes being parts of metalworking machines; Abrading tools being parts of machines; Brush tools being parts of machines; Diamond cutting tools being parts of machines; Diamond sawblades being parts of machines; Diamond-pointed metal-cutting tools for machines; Diamond milling cutters for the treatment of workpieces; Diamond power drill bits for machines; Diamond cutting discs being parts of machines; Diamond grinders being parts of machines; Diamond milling discs being parts of machines; Diamond abrasive plates being parts of machines; Diamond ropes for concrete being parts of machines; Drilling bits for concrete being parts of machines; Drilling bit segments for concrete being parts of machines; Dry core drills being parts of machines; Templates for the treatment of small parts being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Air filtering installations; Water conditioning installations, namely, water conditioning units; Extraction equipment, namely, industrial air filter machines and wet scrubbers for removing particulate matter from the air during industrial processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LISSMAC Maschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LISSMAC Maschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LISSMAC Maschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named LISSMAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |