Drawing for Serial No. 87335527

USPTO serial 87335527

Serial No. 87335527

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 87335527?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Nielsen, Esq.

MARK D. NIELSEN, ESQ. CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones and mobile computers, namely, personalized and interactive social networking software for enabling users to share feedback, opinions and comments about images and videos posted by othersACTIVEJan 30, 2017
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring personalized and interactive social networking computer software platforms for enabling users to share feedback, opinions and comments about images and videos posted online by othersACTIVEJan 30, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 16, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance