Drawing for FERNANDO

USPTO serial 87335732

FERNANDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FERNANDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Grant Morton

246 WEST BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Divans; sofas; armchairs; beds; ottomans; tables; chairs; chaise longues; furniture; mirrors; picture framesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 13, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 11, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance