USPTO serial 87336082
BURMA EATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BURMA EATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Adwere
CYNTHIA R. ADWERE LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R. ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | pre-cooked curry stew; packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; tea leaf salads in the nature of vegetable salads; lotus chips in the nature of vegetable chips; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; processed nut and seed snack mix; prepared nut and seed mix for topping salads; vegetable salads, namely, fermented tea leaf salads also containing processed nuts and beans; fermented tea leaves; pre-packaged salad kit, consisting primarily of fermented tea leaves, processed nuts and processed beans; pre-packaged vegetable salad; soups; fried split pea snacks; salad topping kit consisting primarily of processed nuts and seeds; tea leaf snack bars consisting primarily of fermented tea leaf, processed nuts and processed beans; snack bars made primarily of fermented tea leaves and also including granola | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coconut rice, namely, cooked rice prepared with coconut milk; salad dressing; tea based snacks in the nature of tea leaf snack bars; tea leaf-based snack foods, namely, tea leaf clusters; ginger tea; tea-based beverages; tea; iced tea; sandwiches; sauces; savory sauces used as condiments | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; ginger ale; ginger beer; ginger lemonade; tea drinks, namely, non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; beer; fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Concessions stands featuring food in the nature of food stalls at farmer's markets | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; fast-food restaurants; take-out restaurant services; serving of food and drink/beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Burma Eats Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Burma Eats Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BURMA EATS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |