Drawing for TENSIONWRENCH

USPTO serial 87338433

TENSIONWRENCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TENSIONWRENCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven D. Lustig

STEVEN D LUSTIG DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 EYE STREET NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Handheld power tools and instruments, namely, wrenches and bolting tools for tightening and loosening of boltsACTIVE—
008Handheld manual tools and instruments, namely, wrenches and bolting tools for tightening and loosening of boltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 23, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 23, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 28, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 15, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance