Drawing for PROCESSORIQ

USPTO serial 87339152

PROCESSORIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROCESSORIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor chip sets; Semiconductor chips; Semiconductor devices; Software development kits (SDK); Software for processing images, graphics and text; Software programmable microprocessors; Compiler software; Computer software development tools; Industrial process control software; Microprocessors and semi-conductors; all the foregoing in the field of artificial intelligenceACTIVE—
042Software design and development; Computer software design and updating; all the foregoing in the field of artificial intelligenceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 2, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 22, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance