Drawing for NANOTUBE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 87340176

NANOTUBE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NANOTUBE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Zipkin

NEIL M. ZIPKIN AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUE21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating elements in the nature of electric radiant heater strips formed of a substrate and heat generating materials; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heater strips applied to peel-and-stick backing; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heating strips applied to flexible insulation; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heater strips applied to foam board backing; heating elements for mounting under floors, over existing concrete and on walkways, ceilings, roofing and roofing underlaymentACTIVE—
019Building materials, namely, cement mixes containing heat generating particles and cement mixes for use over heater strips; heated floor underlayment and roof underlayment; construction materials in the nature of non-metal heated composite panels; heated erosion control mesh fabric for stabilizing soil and graded areas; reinforcing materials not of metal in the nature of heated rods for building purposes; reinforcing materials not of metal in the nature of rebars, rods and mesh for strengthening and reinforcing concrete, for building purposes; heat-generating reinforcing materials not of metal for use in forming composite materials, for building purposesACTIVE—
035Distributorship services, wholesale and retail store services, and online wholesale and retail store services, all featuring heat generating building materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance