USPTO serial 87340176
NANOTUBE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOTUBE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil M. Zipkin
NEIL M. ZIPKIN AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUE21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heating elements in the nature of electric radiant heater strips formed of a substrate and heat generating materials; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heater strips applied to peel-and-stick backing; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heating strips applied to flexible insulation; heating elements in the nature of coated electric heater strips applied to foam board backing; heating elements for mounting under floors, over existing concrete and on walkways, ceilings, roofing and roofing underlayment | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Building materials, namely, cement mixes containing heat generating particles and cement mixes for use over heater strips; heated floor underlayment and roof underlayment; construction materials in the nature of non-metal heated composite panels; heated erosion control mesh fabric for stabilizing soil and graded areas; reinforcing materials not of metal in the nature of heated rods for building purposes; reinforcing materials not of metal in the nature of rebars, rods and mesh for strengthening and reinforcing concrete, for building purposes; heat-generating reinforcing materials not of metal for use in forming composite materials, for building purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services, wholesale and retail store services, and online wholesale and retail store services, all featuring heat generating building materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |