Drawing for DISRUPTIVE IMAGINATION

USPTO serial 87344322

DISRUPTIVE IMAGINATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OEHRLEIN, STEFAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISRUPTIVE IMAGINATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer software for recreational game playing purposesACTIVE—
025T-shirts, polo shirts, collared shirts, sweat pants, shorts, hats for adults and childrenACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, action figures and toy figurines; games, namely, board games and card games; playthings, namely, bobble head dollsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 5, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 8, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance