USPTO serial 87344348
GYOZA OHSHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GYOZA OHSHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto,, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
Michele P. Schwartz Jackson Walker LLP2323 Ross AvenueSuite 600Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed meat products; Processed vegetables and fruits; Pickled vegetables; Zha-cai in the nature of szechwan pickles; Processed eggs; Seasoned boiled eggs; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat and vegetables; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat and eggs; Prepared sweet-and-sour pork; Prepared chop suey; Prepared spicy dish of tofu and minced meat; Prepared mabo tofu; Prepared Chinjao Rosu in the nature of stir-fried beef and peppers or pork and peppers; Prepared green pepper steak; Deep-fried chicken; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat or processed meat products; Tempura of fish or shellfish in the nature of deep-fried fish or shellfish in a light batter; Prepared meals consisting primarily of seafood; Prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables or fruits; Prepared meals consisting primarily of eggs and processed eggs; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; pre-cooked curry, stew and soup mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, Chinese style almond jelly in the nature of annin tofu, mango puddings, sesame sweet dumplings, steamed buns stuffed with sweetened bean paste; Bread; Sandwiches; Hamburger sandwiches; Pizzas; Hot dog sandwiches; Meat pies; Steamed buns stuffed with minced meat (Chinese-manjuh); Chinese stuffed dumplings (Gyoza, cooked); Chinese steamed dumplings (Shumai, cooked); Sushi; Japanese traditional food, namely, fried balls of batter mix with small pieces of octopus in the nature of takoyaki; Pre-packaged boxed lunches consisting primarily of rice, with added meat, fish or vegetables; Ravioli; Seasonings (other than spices); Soya bean paste condiment; Sauces for Gyoza (Chinese stuffed dumplings); Worcestershire sauce; Meat gravies; Ketchup sauce; Soya sauce; Vinegar; Mixes of vinegars; Seasoning soy sauce in the nature of Soba-tsuyu; Salad dressings; White sauce; Mayonnaise; Sauces for barbecued meat; Table salt mixed with sesame seeds; Cooking salt; Seasoned salt; Roasted and ground sesame seeds for use in seasoning; Celery salt; Umami seasonings; Cube sugar; Fructose for food; Crystal sugar not in the nature of confectionery; Sugar; Maltose for food; Honey; Glucose for culinary purposes; Powdered starch syrup (for food); Starch syrup for culinary purposes; Cereal-based snack foods; Ramen noodles (Chinese style noodles) | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring Chinese foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 16, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |