USPTO serial 87345760
GRANDE CONCERTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRANDE CONCERTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claire Zopf
CLAIRE ZOPF Z IP LAW PLLC1015 ELM STREET SUITE 201MANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compact discs containing music; digital music downloadable from internet; electronic music books recorded on computer media; ornamental magnets; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books in the field of music, downloadable via a website; downloadable musical podcasts | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | mugs; coffee mugs; travel mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting live entertainment events for others via online global network and social media; business and event management for musical, theatrical and family/variety tours and presentations; promotion of musical artists by way of a website, blog, radio show, social media, podcast and personal appearances; business management, event management services and business marketing and consulting services in the field of entertainment; promoting ticket sales and additional entertainment privileges and packages for live entertainment events; promotion of concert tours for third parties, namely, promoting musical entertainment events by soliciting and arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with such entertainment events for a fee and promotion of third party concerts through advertising via radio, television, magazines, online and print newspapers, flyers, brochures, and posters; online retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded music | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of organizing and conducting music festivals, music performances, film festivals, concerts; production of live entertainment events, namely, live concerts, and festivals; arranging, conducting, organizing and managing music festivals, music concerts and concert tours; providing amusement facilities; entertainment services in the nature of organizing musical, theatrical performances; entertainment services, namely, providing online podcasts in the field of music; providing entertainment information related to schedules of live entertainment events, entertainment news and personality profiles of touring talent; entertainment services, namely, production of performances featuring live music, production of musical concerts and music festivals; entertainment ticket agency services; providing a website featuring information in the field of musical entertainment; providing information in the field of entertainment relating to a recording artist via an online network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YEL Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GRANDE CONCERTO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |