Drawing for PILBLOC

USPTO serial 87345810

PILBLOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILBLOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Gregory Chrisman

J. GREGORY CHRISMAN PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Ropes, string, tents, awnings of textile, tarpaulins, sails; padding and stuffing materials not of rubber, paper or plastic; raw fiber materials, namely, raw flax, jute, raffia, ramie, textile, sisal, raw cotton or true hemp fiber; raw fibrous textile materials; textile fibers; plastic fibers for textile use; semi-synthetic and synthetic fibers; acrylic and natural fibers, namely, flax, hemp and cotton fibers; yarn fibersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 24, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance