Drawing for PRECISIVE

USPTO serial 87346003

PRECISIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBIN, DAVID I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brittany Estell

Brittany Estell Western Digital Technologies, Inc5601 Great Oaks ParkwaySan Jose, CA 95119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising services; business management; business administration services; providing office functions; professional business and business organization consultancy; business efficiency expert services; providing business information in the field of compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; computerized file management; updating and maintenance of data in computer databasesACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer networksACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, workshops, seminars, webinars, conferences, and training provided online from a computer network in the fields of information technology, computer technology, and data storage solutions; education club services in the nature of conducting hands on educational training courses, classes and workshops in the fields information technology, computer technology, and data storage solutions; providing online non-downloadable publications in the nature of user manuals and technical white papers in the fields of information technology, computer technology, and data storage solutions; providing an online website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of information technology, computer technology, and data storage solutions; providing blogs, all the foregoing in the field of non-folative flash memory devices and data center hyperscale, and cloud computing system analysis and optimizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance