Drawing for EQUES HOME

USPTO serial 87347141

EQUES HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUES HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Sullivan

111 N. MARKET ST., STE. 300SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station; Electric door bells; Electric door chimes; Electronic door alarms; Magnifying peepholes for doors; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Video cameras; Webcams; Camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for viewing the images and video captured by a video door viewer; Computer hardware for IP video surveillance; Digital video recording software for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Digital video recording software for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for viewing the images and video captured by a video door viewer; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; Network video recording software for IP (Internet Protocol) video surveillance; Network video recording software for IP (Internet Protocol) video surveillance; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote locationACTIVE—
042Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to share images and videos; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to create, bookmark, annotate, and publicly share data; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to share images and videos; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance