USPTO serial 87347724
THE PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2018
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with THE PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBYN S. LEDERMAN
ROBYN S. LEDERMAN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.150 W. SECOND ST., SUITE 400NROYAL OAK, MI 48067-3846United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Air filters for engines; air-intake tubes and filters for after-market installation of automotive engines; air intake manifolds for internal combustion engines; internal combustion engine exhaust system components, namely, mufflers, muffler parts, collectors, tail pipes, and header pipes | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flowmaster, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Flowmaster, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by B&M RACING & PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named THE PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 6, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |