USPTO serial 87347730
RIDVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIDVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin Kirby Roberts III, Esq.
MARVIN KIRBY ROBERTS III, ESQ. ANDERSON ROBERTS, PLLC823 CONGRESS AVE., STE. P-10AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the coordination of transportation of goods and people, and delivery of goods and delivery and logistics of freight; computer hardware, namely, for the tracking and recordation of transportation and delivery of goods, freight, and people and delivery logistics data; software for engaging transportation, delivery, freight, and logistics services, namely, enabling the ordering, tracking of and scheduling of transportation and delivery of goods and freight and enabling the scheduling of transportation of people; software that enables electronic message alerts and notifications for transportation, delivery, and back-end transportation and freight logistics; software for the provision of transportation, delivery, and freight logistics services, namely, software that enables scheduling notifications for freight services; software for facilitating payments for transportation, delivery, freight, logistics services, and such related ancillary services; software for coordinating, scheduling, and automated dispatch notifications for transportation and delivery of freight, and such related logistics services; software in the field of human resource management, namely, payroll, time recordation, and logistics management for employees and contractors; software for accounting; software for customer relationship management; software for creating and managing invoices, recording payments, and issuing receipts; software for organizing, servicing, and tracking sales, collections, and receivables data; software for synchronizing data; software for providing insurance data, quotes, plan information and options; software for obtaining, storing, organizing, managing, tracking, monitoring, analyzing, securing, authenticating, and reporting business analytics information and data in the fields of business, marketing, promotion, sales, customer service, customer information, customer relationship management, sales support, employee and contractor efficiency, and transportation, delivery, freight, and logistics services; computer software for providing an on-line computer database in the field of transaction processing for transactional data, providing statistical analysis, and producing notifications and reports; software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; software for providing data analytics, business analytics, and business intelligence; software for collecting and analyzing data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |