USPTO serial 87348317
MAOLA FARMER OWNED LOCAL DAIRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2019
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with MAOLA FARMER OWNED LOCAL DAIRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Reston, VA
Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Reston, VA
Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Reston, VA
Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Miller
Marc E. Miller Watkinson Miller PLLC1100 New Jersey Ave. SE, Suite 910WASHINGTON, DC 20003United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen desserts, namely, [ ice cream, ice milk, sherbet, ] ice cream mix | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MAOLA FARMER OWNED LOCAL DAIRIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 14, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 1, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |