USPTO serial 87348855
VERY BEST BY VALERIE BERTINELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERY BEST BY VALERIE BERTINELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Home décor, namely, picture frames, wind chimes, plaques made of plastic or wood, desktop statuaries made of plastic or wood, plant stands, plastic storage boxes, pillows, chair pads, handheld mirrors, vanity mirrors, compact mirrors, wall mirrors, non-metal hooks; interior window coverings, namely, shades, blinds, and shutters; furniture, furniture chests, furniture cabinets, plastic storage boxes, book shelves, library shelves, tables, furniture tables, chests of drawers, cupboards, storage racks, magazine racks, newspaper display stands and non-metal holders for newspapers, dressing tables, desks, seats; chairs, furniture chairs, armchairs, settees; sofas, chaise lounge, easy chairs, office chairs, folding chairs, deck chairs, stools, foot stools, beds, mattresses, cots, curtain holders, not of textile; curtain hooks, rails, rings, rods, rollers and tie-backs; coat stands, umbrella stands; hat stands, coat hangers, garden furniture, kneeling furniture frames and stools; kitchen and dining products, namely, kitchen cabinets, kitchen dressers, dining tables and chairs; bed and bath products, namely, bed pillows, bed rests, beds for household pets; lighting, namely, mirrors enhanced by electric lights; storage and organization, namely, storage and organization systems comprising shelves, drawers, cupboards, baskets and clothes rods, sold as a unit, storage racks, plastic storage drums and boxes, metal storage boxes, toy organizers comprised of shelves and removable storage bins sold as a unit; pillows; chair pads; mirrors; shelving; non-metal hooks; interior window coverings, namely, window shades, indoor blinds; picture frames; wind chimes; non-metal decorative garden stakes, plaques made of plastic or wood, and desktop statuaries made of plastic or wood; plant stands; closet storage in the nature of prefabricated closet organization systems made of wood; beds for household pets; pet cushions; shower curtain hooks; plastic storage boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |