Drawing for LETTUCE TALK

USPTO serial 87348988

LETTUCE TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LETTUCE TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Tang

JOHN A. TANG STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP909 FANNIN STREET, SUITE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newsletters pertaining to food safety and distribution of produce to national and regional restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 22, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2018PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jan 14, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 26, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance