Drawing for Serial No. 87349055

USPTO serial 87349055

Serial No. 87349055

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TORRES, ELIANA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87349055?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Animal litter boxes, animal litter box accessories, namely, animal litter box skirts and litter sifting trays comprised primarily of animal litter traysACTIVE—
031Animal litterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2020FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2020ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 13, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 24, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 19, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 10, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance