Drawing for VB

USPTO serial 87349056

VB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.

JONATHAN D REICHMAN ESQ HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021cookware, namely, steamers and roasting pans; cookware; kitchenware; kitchenware, namely, spoon rests; house ware; house wares, namely, beverage ware, dinner ware, flat ware; Bathroom hardware and accessories, namely, towel bars, toilet paper holders, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, shower caddies; liquid soap and lotion dispensers sold empty; toilet tissue holders; baskets for domestic use not made of metal; toilet brush holders; dinnerware; sugar bowls and creamer pitchers; serving trays and serving platters not of precious metal; coffee service; tea service; non-electric coffee makers; non-electric coffee presses; tea pots; carafes; hand-operated coffee grinders and pepper mills; salt and pepper shakers; beverage ware and stemware; cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasting pans, and saute pans, and bake ware; serving ware for serving food and drinks; napkin rings; napkin holders; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; trivets; non-metal breadbaskets for domestic use; non-metal trays; cuffing boards; contalners for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; cooking utensils, namely, spatulas, mixing spoons, serving spoons, serving forks, and whisks; dispensers for paper towels; barware, namely, cocktail shakers, corkscrews, and ice buckets; vases; planters and hanging baskets for flowers and plants; bird houses, bird feeders, and bird baths; pet feeding and drinking bowls; pet treat jars; plaques made of earthenware, glass, porcelain, terra cotta; desktop statuaries made of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain, terra coil a or wood; household storage containers for pet food; related goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 31, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 19, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance