Drawing for PROJECT SPACES

USPTO serial 87349368

PROJECT SPACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROJECT SPACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brittany Estell

Brittany Estell Western Digital Technologies, Inc5601 Great Oaks ParkwaySan Jose, CA 95119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer products, namely, disk drives, hard disk drives, solid state drives, flash memory cards, hybrid disk drives containing flash memory, blank digital storage media, computer hardware for data storage, computer data storage hardware, and computer peripherals; computer memory hardware; computer hardware, software and firmware for storing, managing, organizing, synchronizing, securing, sharing and backup of electronic data; software for creating and managing partitions on computer storage devices in the nature of small servers, network switches, disk drives, hard drives, solid state drives, flash memory cards, hybrid drives and blank digital storage mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance