Drawing for CASHHERO

USPTO serial 87350129

CASHHERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASHHERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth Townsend Bridge

Elisabeth Townsend Bridge SmithAmundsen LLC330 East Kilbourn Ave., Ste 1100 Tower 1Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Vendor payment services, namely, payment transaction processing services; Vendor payment services, namely, electronic payment transaction processing services; Electronic payment processing services; Financial services, namely, money transfer services; Financial services, namely, electronic processing of payment data; Financial services, namely, assisting others with the completion of electronic and on-line paymentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 7, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 3, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 18, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 30, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 30, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 6, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 3, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 3, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 23, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 23, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance