Drawing for DRINK MORE CHIKIN

USPTO serial 87350492

DRINK MORE CHIKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRINK MORE CHIKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph L. Johnson

JOSEPH L. JOHNSON LATHROP & GAGE, LLP910 E. ST. LOUIS STREET, SUITE 100SPRINGFIELD, MO 65806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Protein supplement shakes; Protein supplements; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix containing chicken proteinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 18, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 22, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance