USPTO serial 87351523
RADIOMOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RADIOMOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sana Hakim
Sana Hakim K&LGATES LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; wireless mobile data hardware, namely, mobile data terminals for in-vehicle use, dispatch equipment, wireless modems, computer software used in the management of commercial fleets and warehouse inventory; ruggedized laptop computers; computer hardware for in-vehicle use for the collection and transmission of data in the field of commercial vehicle and cargo condition and location; ruggedized laptop computers for in-vehicle use for the collection and transmission of data in the field of commercial vehicle and cargo condition and location; computer hardware for in-vehicle use for the collection and transmission of data in the field of security services, emergency response and law enforcement; wireless mobile data hardware for in-vehicle use, namely, mobile data terminals for in-vehicle use, wireless modems; ruggedized laptop computers for in-vehicle use for the collection and transmission of data in the field of security services, emergency response and law enforcement | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |