USPTO serial 87352882
DIFFERENT BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIFFERENT BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schnurr
DAVID J. SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLPACCELERATOR BUILDING295 HAGEY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300WATERLOO, ONTARIO, N2L6R5Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |