USPTO serial 87355148
CONNECT AIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONNECT AIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PHILLIPS CONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
PHILLIPS CONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
R.A. Phillips Industries, Inc.
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED AIR BRAKING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PRESSURE SENSORS FOR MONITORING PRESSURE OF AIR BRAKING SYSTEMS, AIR BRAKE ACTUATORS FOR ENGAGING AND DISENGAGING THE AIR LINES TO THE AIR BRAKING SYSTEMS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR MONITORING THE STATE OF THE AIR BRAKING SYSTEMS AND FOR CONTROLLING THE AIR BRAKE ACTUATORS; AIR BRAKE PRODUCTS FOR LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, NAMELY, PRESSURE SENSORS, AIR BRAKE ACTUATORS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS; ELECTRONIC BRAKING DEVICES FOR LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, COMPRISED OF PRESSURE SENSORS, AIR BRAKE ACTUATORS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS; ELECTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL APPARATUS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR CONTROLLING AIR BRAKES, PRESSURE SENSORS, AIR BRAKE ACTUATORS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR USE IN TRAILERS AND HEAVY TRUCKS, TRACTORS AND TRAILERS; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR CONTROLLING BRAKES; ELECTRONIC BRAKE CONTROLS FOR USE IN LAND VEHICLES AND VEHICLE TRAILERS; PRESSURE SENSORS, AIR BRAKE ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATORS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED AIR BRAKING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF AIR TANKS BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF TRAILERS, AND AIR LINES BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS; AIR BRAKE PRODUCTS BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, NAMELY, PNEUMATIC VALVES AND AIR LINES; ELECTRONIC BRAKING DEVICES BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, COMPRISED OF PNEUMATIC VALVES AND AIR LINES; BRAKE SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF AIR TANKS AND AIR LINES BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS; BRAKING SYSTEM PRODUCTS BEING STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, NAMELY, PNEUMATIC VALVES AND AIR LINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS CONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS CONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by R.A. Phillips Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CONNECT AIR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |