USPTO serial 87356161
IPAYED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSEN, BENJAMIN H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPAYED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOLLY H. SAPORITO
HOLLY H. SAPORITO ALSTON & BIRD1201 WEST PEACHTREE STREETATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments through pre-paid cards; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing multiple payment options by means of customer-operated electronic terminals available on-site in retail stores; Stored value prepaid card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |