Drawing for QUICK SUITE

USPTO serial 87356179

QUICK SUITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MALASHEVICH, JASON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUICK SUITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Spletzer, Sr.

1005 Virgina AveFort Washington, PA 19034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007semiconductor manufacturing machines, namely, semiconductor packaging machinesACTIVEJun 5, 2018
009software for operating semiconductor manufacturing machines in the nature of semiconductor packaging machinesACTIVEJun 5, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 14, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 18, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 18, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 21, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 1, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 23, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 23, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 9, 2017TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Mar 9, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 6, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance