Drawing for VITALIX

USPTO serial 87357466

VITALIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITALIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James David Johnson

JAMES DAVID JOHNSON JOHNSON & MARTIN, P.A.500 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROADSUITE 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Personal care products, namely, lotions, creams, serums, washes, and shampoos for delaying the natural conditions associated with aging; non-medicated skin, body, and hair topical preparations, namely, lotions, creams, serums, washes, and shampoos for delaying the natural conditions associated with aging; beauty products, namely, topical lotions, creams, and oilsACTIVE—
005Dietary supplements; dietary supplements for delaying the natural conditions associated with agingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 13, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance