USPTO serial 87358066
NOMSPIRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOMSPIRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad M. Behar
Brad M. Behar BRAD M. BEHAR & ASSOCIATES, PLLC94 SECOND STREETMINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration of an innovation and product development program utilizing credits, awards, and prizes as incentives for participation by employees and customers; Administration of an award based program to conduct product research; Administration of a credit, prize, or award based program for the purpose of obtaining employee and customer assistance with identifying suppliers of products and services; Administration of a credit, prize, or award based program for the purpose of obtaining employee and customer assistance with identifying and vetting new product ideas; Providing a forum for individuals to share comments and criticisms about products in exchange for credits, prizes, or awards; Providing an incentive based program to encourage employees or customers to participate in product development or to share information about suppliers and manufacturers; Conducting Business research and surveys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |