Drawing for NIBBLE

USPTO serial 87358302

NIBBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NIBBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Frank

KAREN FRANK COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLPONE MONTGOMERY STREETSUITE 3000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and online store services featuring fresh and healthy snack foodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2020MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 24, 2020ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 24, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 2020OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance