Drawing for CHEMATICA

USPTO serial 87358857

CHEMATICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMATICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Computer software for accessing, processing, storage, retrieval and presentation of information in the field of chemical reactions and synthetic pathways; computer software for use in retrosynthesis chemical pathway discovery and optimization for both known chemical targets and previously unexplored, virtual, molecules; computer software which uses electronic databases of chemical reactions and substances to perform chemical data analysis and chemical synthetic planningACTIVE
042Chemical data analysis and chemical synthetic planning through the use of electronic databases of chemical reactions and substancesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 7, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 7, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 27, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 27, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 27, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 16, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 8, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 1, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance