Drawing for CLEANWIPES

USPTO serial 87360316

CLEANWIPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANWIPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor E. Libert

VICTOR E. LIBERT CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Fiber optic cleaning wipes, dispensers filled with disposable cleaning wipes for use in cleaning fiber optics, dispensers for dispensing fiber optic cleaning wipes from a roll of such wipes contained within the dispenser, the wipes are not impregnated with chemicals or compounds for cleaning, disinfecting or the like, and such dispensers which feature an integrated work surface for cleaning fiber optic endsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 28, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 28, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance