USPTO serial 87361397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PALO ALTO, CA, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
PALO ALTO, CA, US
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for use in collecting, storing, viewing, sorting, manipulating, and analyzing data of the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured; computer software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, predicting, and managing issues with equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; computer software to monitor, control, manage, improve, and optimize equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; computer software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track issues, and generate production reports; computer software for statistical analysis of data obtained from and the monitoring of process controls systems and production issues in manufacturing; computer software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing manufacturing issues, namely, issues regarding process, workmanship, quality, and design; computer hardware, electric sensors, motion sensors, cameras, lights, radio transmitters and receivers, motion and light detectors, and robotic machinery, with all of the aforementioned being for use in connection with monitoring, controlling, managing, improving, and optimizing, the assembly line, test stations, and other processes in manufacturing; computer software for use in processing and managing part quality and product quality; computer software for use in extracting insights from bill of materials, supply chain, part quality, product quality, returns, recalls and repairs; computer software for use in comparing and analyzing idealized models of hardware to actual parts, components, and products; computer software for use comparing and predicting the performance of parts, process, and products | ACTIVE | May 5, 2016 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in collecting, storing, viewing, sorting, manipulating, and analyzing data of the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured and for developing insights about the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing issues with equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to monitor, control, manage, improve, and optimize equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track issues, and generate production reports; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for statistical analysis of data obtained from and the monitoring of process controls systems and production issues in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing manufacturing issues, namely, issues regarding process, workmanship, quality, and design; engineering services; engineering services in the field of manufacturing and the improvement and optimization of manufacturing production and processes; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in processing and managing part quality and product quality; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in extracting insights from bill of materials, supply chain, part quality, product quality, returns, recalls and repairs; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in comparing and analyzing idealized models of hardware to actual parts, components, and products; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use comparing and predicting the performance of parts, process, and products | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 2016 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |