USPTO serial 87363353
GRANDMOTHERS CAMPAIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRANDMOTHERS CAMPAIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the effects of HIV and AIDS on African families; Promoting public awareness campaigns of African grandmothers and the orphaned children in their care through education, meetings, distribution of printed publications, a web site and through speaking engagements | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services; organizing fundraising charitable events in support of African grandmothers and children in their care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |