Drawing for HOLESHOT

USPTO serial 87363402

HOLESHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLESHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Meyer

SUSAN B. MEYER GORDON & REES LLP101 W BROADWAY STE 2000SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely, protective eyewear, sunglasses, goggles for sports, namely, snowboarding goggles, skiing goggles, motor cross goggles, prescription glasses and spectacles; replacement frames and lenses for eyeglasses and sunglasses; eyewear cases and covers, eyewear accessories in the nature of straps, cables, lanyards and cordsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 13, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 21, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 21, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance