USPTO serial 87364491
A APAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A APAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, administration of transactions involving funds drawn from securities, stocks, funds, equities, bonds, cash, or other types of financial investments in retirement plans using a credit or debit card over a global data network; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; providing payment processing services and payment verification services for mobile payments, contactless credit and debit card transactions, gift card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices; providing financial information by electronic means, namely, providing credit and debit card information; financial services, namely, processing and administration of mobile payments and contactless debit and credit card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing user authentication of electronic funds transfer in the nature of mobile payments, contactless credit and debit card transactions, gift card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |