USPTO serial 87366277
OPEN MOTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN MOTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Chassis for motor vehicles; Chassis for railway cars; Driverless cars; Electric cars; Electric motors for motor cars; Self-driving transport vehicles; Self-driving transport vehicles; Armoured cars; Automatically guided material handling tractors; Automobile chassis; Autonomous cars; Autonomous cars; Cable cars; Chains for motor cars; Driverless cars; Electric cars; Golf cars; Hybrid cars; Motor cars; Racing cars; Racing motor cars; Railway cars; Sports cars; Vehicle chassis | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2017 |
| 039 | Car rental; Car rental, garage and parking space rental; Car sharing services; Rental car reservation; Rental of car parking spaces; Rental of cars; Rental of electric cars; Rental of GPS-equipped vehicles, namely, scooters, electric cars and bicycles; Rental of motor racing cars | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2016 |
| 042 | Design of computer databases; Design of computers; Design of engineering products; Design of factory buildings; Design of mobile telephones; Design of production facilities; Design of solar photovoltaic systems; Design of traffic control equipment; Engineering; Engineering design services; Engineering drawing services; Mechanical engineering; Automotive design services; Combustion engine systems design services; Computer software design; Computer website design; Computer-aided design services; Computer-aided engineering services for others; Consulting in the field of engineering; Design of engineering products; Engineering design services; Interior design consultation; Machine part design services; Mechanical engineering; Motor vehicle parts design services; New product design services; Non-land vehicles design services; Product development and engineering services for others; Research relating to mechanical engineering; Smartphone software design; Software design and development; Traffic and transportation engineering; Web site design; Web site design consultancy; Website design consultancy | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSVehicle Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Liu, Tin Hang
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPEN MOTORS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |