USPTO serial 87370103
AERIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meredith Frank Mendez, Esq.
MEREDITH FRANK MENDEZ MALLOY & MALLOY PL2800 SW 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |