Drawing for E-TELLIGENT

USPTO serial 87371991

E-TELLIGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-TELLIGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen K. Hammond

Karen K. Hammond HGCI, Inc.3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 250Las Vegas, NV 89169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009controller adapted for use with multiple special purpose horticulture ballastsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 1, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance