USPTO serial 87372357
FASTBACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASTBACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Louisville, CO
Louisville, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Warn
PHILIP R WARN WARN PARTNERS PCPO BOX 70098ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Soft tops for sport utility vehicles; Vehicle parts and accessories, namely, enclosures and windows sold as a unit for the cargo area of sport utility vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 15, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |