USPTO serial 87373737
EXPLORE RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPLORE RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Worth, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clark R. Cowley
CLARK R. COWLEY WHITAKER CHALK SWINDLE & SCHWARTZ PLLC301 COMMERCE ST.SUITE 3500FORT WORTH, TX 76102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business data analytics, namely, collecting and reporting pharmacy dispensing data, clinical information, prescription referral data, reimbursement information, and other business data to pharmacies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, health plans, pharmacy benefit managers, third party administrators, nursing organizations, and health care providers for business analysis purposes | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2016 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing a web-based system and online portal featuring on-line non-downloadable software for use by pharmacies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, health plans, pharmacy benefit managers, third party administrators, nursing organizations, and health care providers which enables users to access and manage patient related medical information | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |