USPTO serial 87374099
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SARONNO (Varese), IT
SARONNO (Varese), IT
SARONNO (Varese), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B SLADKUS THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | White of eggs; albumen for culinary purposes; milk beverages, milk predominating; fruit peel; cocoa butter for food; cranberry sauce; jams; tinned fruits; milk shakes; fruit chips; frozen fruits; fruit, preserved; fruit, stewed; candied fruit; crystallized fruits; berries, preserved; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; fruit jellies; edible fats; coconut fat; almonds, ground; marmalade; hazelnuts, prepared; prepared nuts; cream; fruit pulp; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit-based snack food; yolk of eggs; yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flavorings for beverages, other than essential oils; vanilla flavorings for culinary purposes; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; tea-based beverages; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; puddings; waffles; chocolate; confectionery made of sugar; pancakes; candy decorations for cakes; chocolate decorations for cakes; ice cream; edible ices; fruit jelly candy; cake frosting; cocoa-based ingredients in confectionery products; thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; starch-based binding agents for ice cream; candy mints; honey; dessert mousse; almond paste; pastry dough; cake dough; pasta; pastries; baking powder; ice cream powder; cocoa; starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; sauces; sherbets; frozen yogurt; sugar; semi-processed ice cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |