USPTO serial 87376839
WORKSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2023
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with WORKSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Atkins
Michael G. Atkins ATKINS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PLLC113 Cherry Street #18483Seattle, WA 98104-2205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for staff scheduling; Software for gross pay calculation | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2023 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |