USPTO serial 87377154
STARFISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARFISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J Peckham
DEBORAH J PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for management, cataloging, accessing, transfer, storage, backup, archiving, deduplication and analysis of data, system metrics, and metadata; computer software to generate reports regarding computer data, system metrics, and metadata; computer software for managing computer storage, computer files, computer file systems, object stores, and computer applications; computer software for content management, data governance and application management; Computer software for storing and retrieving data in public and private clouds and object stores | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 2012 |
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of data storage, data, system metrics, and metadata management, data protection, file system management, and data archiving; business data analysis, namely, analysis of data, system metrics, and metadata | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2011 |
| 042 | Computer consulting in the fields of data, system metrics, and metadata collection, governance, management, cataloging, accessing, transfer, storage, backup, archiving, deduplication, analysis, and reporting; provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for data and metadata management, namely, collecting, managing, cataloging, accessing, transferring, storing, backing up, archiving, deduplicating, and analyzing data, system metrics, and metadata; provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software featuring technology that allows the users to generate reports regarding computer data, system metrics, and metadata; design of data storage solutions for others, namely, design of hardware and software electronic data storage solutions for others; Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data and metadata storage and management in the fields of enterprise information technology, enterprise data storage, electronic data storage, and information management; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data and metadata storage and management in the fields of enterprise information technology, enterprise data storage, electronic data storage, and information management; cloud computing management, namely, computer services in the nature of remote and on-site management of cloud computing systems and applications for others; cataloging data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, creating computer and computer network based indexes of data, system metrics, and metadata for others using information technology; backup of data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, remote, on-site, and online backup of electronic data; archiving data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, electronic storage services for archiving electronic data; data migration services, namely, migration of electronic data between remote, on-site, and online data storage systems; data mining in the nature of accessing and analyzing data, system metrics, and metadata | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |